From ICD-10 to ICD-11: What Healthcare Leaders Need to Know

Last updated on
April 9, 2025

The ICD Journey: From 10 to 11

What Made ICD-10 a Big Leap?

When ICD-10 replaced ICD-9, it was more than a minor update—it was a revolution. With 68,000 codes compared to ICD-9’s 13,000, it introduced the granularity healthcare systems needed to better document diagnoses and procedures. But while it solved many challenges of the time, the healthcare world has since outgrown it.

What’s Driving ICD-11 Adoption?

Released by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2019, ICD-11 addresses the pain points that have emerged with ICD-10:

Interoperability: ICD-11 aligns seamlessly with digital tools like electronic health records (EHRs), AI platforms, and international standards like SNOMED CT.

Ease of Use: Despite its depth, ICD-11 simplifies coding by reducing redundancies and improving logical code structures.

Future-Proofing: Its digital-first design ensures it will evolve alongside modern technologies.

ICD-11 isn’t just a better coding system—it’s a smarter one, designed for the era of big data, AI, and global connectivity.

Who’s Leading the ICD-11 Charge?

icd 11 leaders

Adoption of ICD-11 is already underway globally:

United Arab Emirates (UAE): A regional leader, the UAE has made significant progress in integrating ICD-11 into its healthcare infrastructure.

European Countries: Nations like Belgium and the Netherlands are at the forefront of piloting ICD-11 in national health systems.

Asia: Japan is exploring phased adoption, leveraging ICD-11’s compatibility with digital health initiatives.

Meanwhile, in the U.S., ICD-10 remains the standard, but the delay provides a window for preparation. The transition to ICD-11 is inevitable—it’s just a matter of time.

Why This Matters to Healthcare Leaders

ICD-11 isn’t just about coding accuracy—it’s about the business of healthcare. Consider these points:

1. Financial Impact

Coding errors cost U.S. healthcare systems $36 billion annually (Journal of AHIMA).

ICD-11’s improved structure reduces ambiguity, meaning fewer errors, faster reimbursements, and lower administrative costs.

2. Global Relevance

As countries adopt ICD-11, staying on ICD-10 could make international collaboration more difficult. Whether it’s research partnerships or global patient care, ICD-11 ensures your organization isn’t left behind.

3. Preparing for Change

Early preparation reduces the disruption of transitions. Organizations investing now in ICD-11-compatible systems, staff training, and automation tools will save costs and avoid rushed implementation later.

Lessons from ICD-10: What We Learned

The transition to ICD-10 wasn’t without its challenges. Some organizations faced:

High Implementation Costs: Upgrading systems and retraining staff added up.

Coding Backlogs: Many organizations underestimated the complexity of the shift, leading to delays in billing and reimbursement.

These lessons should inform how healthcare leaders approach ICD-11. The good news? Technology has advanced significantly since the ICD-10 transition, making this shift smoother for those who plan ahead.

Steps to Get Ahead

Leverage Automation and Integration

Manually mapping codes is labor-intensive and error-prone. Automation tools, like API solutions for diagnostic code mapping, simplify the process and reduce errors. These tools can handle both ICD-10 and ICD-11 codes, ensuring a seamless transition.

For example, our solution integrates directly with EHR systems and uses machine learning to map unstructured clinical data to standardized codes.

Train Your Teams Early

The complexity of ICD-11 requires training not just for coders but for clinicians and administrators. Investing in early education will ease the transition and avoid disruptions later.

Adopt Interoperable Systems

ICD-11 emphasizes global interoperability. Systems that support standards like HL7 and FHIR are better equipped for this transition, enabling seamless data exchange across platforms.

Why This Is an Investment, Not a Cost

Compliance can feel like a burden, but it’s also an opportunity. ICD-11 offers:

Improved Analytics: More precise codes mean better data for decision-making.

Higher Reimbursement Rates: Accurate coding ensures claims are approved faster and with fewer denials.

Operational Efficiency: Automated tools reduce administrative workloads, allowing teams to focus on patient care.

As the saying goes: “The cost of preparation is always lower than the cost of falling behind.”

Conclusion: Future-Proof Your Organization

ICD-11 isn’t just the next version of coding—it’s a roadmap to the future of healthcare. For leaders, this is the moment to take action: review your systems, invest in tools and training, and prepare for a smoother transition. Waiting until the last minute will only amplify costs and risks.

The shift from ICD-10 to ICD-11 isn’t just a change in codes; it’s a transformation in how healthcare organizations operate and collaborate on a global scale. By acting now, you’re not just staying compliant—you’re building a foundation for smarter, more efficient healthcare.

The Hidden Cost of Disconnected Data in Healthcare

Disconnected data isn’t just a technical nuisance. It’s a direct threat to patient care, operational efficiency, and the credibility of healthcare institutions. And while electronic systems have become more common, the fragmentation between them continues to undermine their purpose.
Read post

How Patient Registries Drive Real-World Evidence—and Why It Matters

RWE is gaining traction not just with researchers, but with policymakers and payers. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA are increasingly using RWE
Read post

7 Key Insights on Bridging Patient Registries with EHR Systems

Successful integration creates space: for faster decisions, more coordinated care, and fewer manual handoffs. It also reduces risk-not just clinically, but operationally. As patient data becomes more complex and privacy rules tighten, a reliable bridge between registries and EHRs isn't just helpful; it's foundational. The question isn't whether systems should connect. It's whether your connection truly works for the people using it every day. If not, it's time to build a smarter bridge-one that brings information closer to action.
Read post

Choosing the Right Patient Registry: 5 Questions Every Healthcare Leader Should Ask

A patient registry isn’t just a software decision—it’s a clinical, operational, and strategic one. The right system improves care, simplifies reporting, and builds a solid foundation for growth and research. So don’t just ask what it can do. Ask how it will work for you. The best solutions aren’t always the flashiest—they’re the ones that quietly fit, adapt, and support your goals every step of the way.
Read post

Top 10 Must-Have Features in Patient Registry Software

A modern patient registry platform should quietly support the work that clinicians and administrators do every day. It shouldn’t demand attention—it should provide clarity, security, and structure, allowing the focus to remain on patients and outcomes. These ten features are not bells and whistles—they’re the practical foundation for any serious healthcare system looking to do its work better.
Read post

How Does a Healthcare Data Warehouse Support Population Health Management?

In the modern healthcare landscape, the concept of population health management (PHM) has risen to prominence as a way to improve patient outcomes while managing costs. But addressing the health needs of an entire population is no small feat.
Read post