Top Strategies for Maintaining ICD-10 Compliance and Adapting to Future Coding Changes

Last updated on
April 9, 2025

In the evolving world of healthcare, staying compliant with medical coding standards like ICD-10 is not just about following the rules—it’s about building a system that supports accuracy, minimizes financial risks, and prepares for future challenges. The stakes are high, and with the arrival of ICD-11 in several regions, the question isn’t just about meeting today’s requirements but ensuring adaptability for tomorrow.

This guide explores the top strategies healthcare organizations can implement to maintain ICD-10 compliance while laying the groundwork for future coding changes. From automation to interoperability and regulatory preparation, here’s how to stay ahead.

Why ICD-10 Compliance is Crucial

ICD-10 brought significant improvements over its predecessor, ICD-9, offering unparalleled detail with over 68,000 codes. This specificity allows for more accurate documentation, better analytics, and streamlined billing processes. But it also introduced challenges. The complexity of coding means that errors are common, and these errors can have costly consequences.

According to the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA), nearly 30% of denied claims are linked to coding errors, resulting in billions of dollars lost annually. Compliance is more than just a regulatory requirement—it’s a financial safeguard. Accurate coding ensures smoother billing cycles, faster reimbursements, and reduced administrative burden.

Yet, compliance is not static. With ICD-10 updates happening annually and ICD-11 adoption already underway in some regions, staying compliant requires an adaptable, forward-thinking approach.

Preparing for the Future with ICD-11

ICD Code version timeline

Timeline of ICD-9, ICD-10, and ICD-11 Adoption

ICD-11, introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2019, represents the next step in diagnostic coding. While ICD-10 remains the standard in the U.S. and many other countries, regions like the UAE and parts of Europe are already beginning to adopt ICD-11.

Compared to ICD-10, ICD-11 features over 55,000 codes, but it’s designed for greater user-friendliness and improved integration with digital health technologies. It aligns better with AI tools, electronic health records (EHRs), and global interoperability standards. For healthcare organizations, preparing for ICD-11 means investing in systems that can handle both current and future coding requirements.

Adapting to these changes isn’t just about updating software. It requires a strategic approach that includes staff training, seamless system integrations, and diagnostic code mapping tools capable of supporting both ICD-10 and ICD-11.

“ICD-11 is a game-changer for global healthcare. Its integration with digital health systems will significantly improve interoperability and clinical outcomes.”— World Health Organization (WHO)

Strategies to Ensure Compliance and Future Readiness

1. Automate Diagnostic Code Mapping

Manually coding diagnoses and procedures leaves room for human error and inefficiencies. Automation offers a way to simplify the process while reducing the risk of errors.

For example, our API and on-prem solutions use machine learning (ML) to map diagnoses to ICD-10 or SNOMED codes quickly and accurately. These tools are designed to handle unstructured clinical notes, seamlessly integrating with EHRs and other hospital systems. By automating diagnostic code mapping, organizations not only ensure compliance but also free up staff to focus on patient care.

Here is a workflow representing an automated, efficient, and secure approach to diagnostic code mapping. By integrating ML-driven tools with existing healthcare systems, it prepares organizations for current compliance (ICD-10) while also future-proofing for ICD-11 and other coding changes.

Diagnostic Code Mapping workflow

“Automation in diagnostic coding can reduce administrative costs by 25% and coding errors by 30%, creating a smoother claims process and improved efficiency.”— Source: AHIMA

2. Focus on Interoperability

Interoperability is the backbone of compliance. Without seamless data exchange between systems—whether it’s EHRs, billing platforms, or lab systems—errors and inconsistencies are inevitable. Interoperability ensures that codes are accurately applied across all platforms, reducing the risk of mismatched data.

Standards like HL7 and FHIR enable this connectivity, allowing systems to share data securely and efficiently. For example, tools that support SNOMED to ICD-10 conversion play a critical role in ensuring that data remains consistent across platforms. These tools also make it easier to adapt to ICD-11, which emphasizes global interoperability.

“Without interoperability, healthcare systems risk inefficiencies that lead to errors, delays, and increased costs.”— HIMSS (Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society)

3. Strengthen Security with Audit Trails

Healthcare organizations handle some of the most sensitive data, and coding compliance is deeply tied to data security. Features like role-based access control (RBAC) ensure that only authorized users can access specific information. Audit trails, on the other hand, provide a record of every coding change, making it easier to track and correct errors.

These security measures don’t just protect patient data—they also ensure that organizations are prepared for audits. Demonstrating compliance to regulators becomes much simpler when every action is traceable.

4. Plan for ICD-11 Transition

While ICD-10 remains the focus, it’s important to start preparing for ICD-11 now. This includes updating systems, training staff, and ensuring that your tools are adaptable. Early preparation minimizes disruptions when the transition becomes mandatory.

The ROI of Compliance

Investing in compliance isn’t just about avoiding penalties—it’s about maximizing efficiency and revenue. Coding errors are costly, but automation, interoperability, and robust security measures all contribute to measurable returns.

Reduced Administrative Costs: Automating diagnostic code mapping can reduce operational costs by 25% (Journal of Healthcare Finance).

Fewer Coding Errors: Interoperability reduces errors by as much as 30%, improving claim success rates.

Faster Reimbursements: Accurate coding ensures smoother billing cycles, reducing delays and denials.

“The cost of compliance is always lower than the cost of non-compliance.” – Healthcare Finance Journal

These benefits aren’t just financial. By improving coding accuracy and streamlining processes, compliance efforts support better patient care and stronger organizational performance.

Building a Future-Ready System

Compliance with ICD-10 is about more than avoiding penalties. It’s about creating a foundation for success—one that improves operational efficiency, safeguards patient data, and prepares for future changes like ICD-11. By investing in automation, interoperability, and security, healthcare organizations can build systems that not only meet today’s standards but also adapt to tomorrow’s challenges.

In a world where coding errors can cost millions and delay care, staying compliant is not just a regulatory necessity—it’s an opportunity to build trust and deliver better outcomes.

The Hidden Cost of Disconnected Data in Healthcare

Disconnected data isn’t just a technical nuisance. It’s a direct threat to patient care, operational efficiency, and the credibility of healthcare institutions. And while electronic systems have become more common, the fragmentation between them continues to undermine their purpose.
Read post

How Patient Registries Drive Real-World Evidence—and Why It Matters

RWE is gaining traction not just with researchers, but with policymakers and payers. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA are increasingly using RWE
Read post

7 Key Insights on Bridging Patient Registries with EHR Systems

Successful integration creates space: for faster decisions, more coordinated care, and fewer manual handoffs. It also reduces risk-not just clinically, but operationally. As patient data becomes more complex and privacy rules tighten, a reliable bridge between registries and EHRs isn't just helpful; it's foundational. The question isn't whether systems should connect. It's whether your connection truly works for the people using it every day. If not, it's time to build a smarter bridge-one that brings information closer to action.
Read post

Choosing the Right Patient Registry: 5 Questions Every Healthcare Leader Should Ask

A patient registry isn’t just a software decision—it’s a clinical, operational, and strategic one. The right system improves care, simplifies reporting, and builds a solid foundation for growth and research. So don’t just ask what it can do. Ask how it will work for you. The best solutions aren’t always the flashiest—they’re the ones that quietly fit, adapt, and support your goals every step of the way.
Read post

Top 10 Must-Have Features in Patient Registry Software

A modern patient registry platform should quietly support the work that clinicians and administrators do every day. It shouldn’t demand attention—it should provide clarity, security, and structure, allowing the focus to remain on patients and outcomes. These ten features are not bells and whistles—they’re the practical foundation for any serious healthcare system looking to do its work better.
Read post

How Does a Healthcare Data Warehouse Support Population Health Management?

In the modern healthcare landscape, the concept of population health management (PHM) has risen to prominence as a way to improve patient outcomes while managing costs. But addressing the health needs of an entire population is no small feat.
Read post